Judiciary of pakistan

Judiciary of Pakistan

If the people of Pakistan honor judges for rendering brave judgments and for not bowing before the illegal demands of rulers, this will support and provide an incentive for other judges to be independent and brave.

Athar Minallah resigned his distinguished civil services career to join the Lawyers' Movement. They take corrective measures at the right time because they know that negligence on such scores could split them into pieces and nobody would then be able to consolidate and save them.

Perhaps, they are also wary that if they resume adversarial politics, there may be a renewed jail term for them. Ebrahim 's son Zahid Ebrahim. The civil society, too, needs to mount pressure on these leaders and make them realize that, Judiciary of pakistan they have had the cases against them settled, they should do the long-suffering nation a favor and have President Musharraf given appropriate treatment in the joint session of the parliament.

The Supreme Court found that the ordinance came at a time which is protected under 17th constitutional amendment. Thus, the mutual relationship of these functionaries does not carry any of those nuances of personal authority that may be found, for example, among elder and younger brothers.

The march was from Karachi to Islamabad to demand the reinstatement of a Supreme Court Chief Justice and other judges ousted from office by former President Pervez Musharraf. To be eligible for appointment, Lawyers must have ten years' experience as an advocate with good standing in the respective jurisdiction.

The government identifies corrupt judges and allows them to abuse their positions; in return, the judges oblige the government when it needs them. International Comparisons The United States subscribes to the method of appointment of all federal judges with the choice of the ruling political party.

The recent verdicts that the Supreme Court of Pakistan has doled out to the PML-N are clearly going to impact the result of upcoming general elections. Political Will for Restoration of Judges In view of the facts and principles discussed above, restoration of the 60 sacked judges in Pakistan is a sine qua non for guaranteeing an independent judiciary.

Some of them were serving as additional session judges before they were appointed as judges of the Supreme Court. Civil Procedure Code and Qanun-e-Shahdat Order Evidence Law are not applicable over to Family Court and the same are allowed to form or regulate its own procedure to decide case expeditiously, properly and in the best interest and convenience of lady litigants.

The High Courts cannot be doing this on their own, and must be instructed by the provincial governments to do so. The only distinction this family enjoys that father and his two sons served as Secretary of Bar.

Presiding over a three-member bench, Khosa held that the prosecution failed to prove the occurrence of blasphemy beyond a reasonable doubt and the police investigation was faulty and flawed. We can stop constitutional deviations and we can successfully forestall them. In the USA, for example, there are problems at the lower level, and the people are asking why their judges are divided between Democrats and Republicans and why they cannot have one judgment that is absolutely unbiased and unaffected by considerations of political selection.

To reiterate, institutions are made of individuals, and to establish reliable institutions, we shall have to create an environment where a noble soul is always applauded and a weak person is effectively checked.

It would have to side with the rulers and conform to their wishes at all times. On a larger level, there should be no threat that if a judge decides a case against the ruler, the entire court might be wrapped up.

To make the judiciary more independent, a strict separation of powers along with mutual cooperation between the pillars of the government is needed.

There are only these two options. One way would be to punish the culprits, and along with them, their collaborators, by holding public hearings and identifying those who welcomed the constitutional deviation.

In this era of independent judiciary, the High Courts should standup against the governments on this issue and refuse to confer powers on the already over-burdened courts and instead should insist upon establishing exclusive juvenile courts.

If the political forces move in unison, this can happen. Notably, independence of the judiciary is a relative concept across the societies of the world. While the government continues to resist the legitimate demand for restoration of the judiciary, the nation has come to a standstill.

Now, it looks as if one party never meant for this covenant to be acted upon. The Real Crisis The real crisis in Pakistan is that of leadership. Otherwise, any person or persons could declare themselves the Supreme Court, render a judgment, have it published in the press, and say this is the judgment everybody should follow.

Ten years have passed, and not a single such court has been established; and instead the High Courts have been conferring status of the juvenile courts on the existing courts. They take corrective measures at the right time because they know that negligence on such scores could split them into pieces and nobody would then be able to consolidate and save them.

Supreme Court of Pakistan

But corruption has taken roots in the system only because it has been patronized, by design, by successive regimes. In this era of independent judiciary, the High Courts should standup against the governments on this issue and refuse to confer powers on the already over-burdened courts and instead should insist upon establishing exclusive juvenile courts.

In the past, judges did fail us by refusing to take a stand, or by abandoning their stand at the eleventh hour. He was arrested and detained with his family during the emergency rule. The only way to have a clean, honest and independent judiciary is to kill the corruption and not the independence.

This action was condoned by the federal judiciary led by Justice Muhammad Munir in Federation of Pakistan v.

Judiciary in Pakistan: Flawed judgments and fallacies plague country's fractured justice system

The judiciary in Pakistan seems to have failed to satisfy the aforementioned two approaches. In case of the subjective approach, the populace questions credibility of. The Judicial System of Pakistan 2 At the village level, tribunals dispensed justice, which consisted of the assembly of the village, or the caste or the family.1 The village Headman acted as Judge/Magistrate for the makomamoa.comons.

The Pakitan Army is obviously perturbed that its carefully crafted mission with the Pakistan higher judiciary to remove any chances of a Nawaz Sharif's return to the political scene, has some unrealised resistance.

Revival of the Constitution and Judiciary in Pakistan

Nov 14,  · Inside Story SJun12 • E18 Inside Story - How politicised is Pakistan's judiciary? - Duration: Al Jazeera English 9, views. This action was condoned by the federal judiciary led by Justice Muhammad Munir in Federation of Pakistan v.

Maulvi Tamizuddin Khan. Justice Munir declared that the constitutional assembly had “lived in a fool’s paradise if ever seized with the notion that it was the sovereign body of the state”.

The Supreme Court of Pakistan (Urdu: عدالت عظمیٰ پاکستان ‬ ‎; Adālat-e-Uzma Pākistān) is the apex court in the judicial hierarchy of Pakistan.

Established in accordance to the Part VII of the Constitution of Pakistan, it has ultimate and extensive appellate, original, and advisory jurisdictions on all courts (including the high courts, district, special and .

Judiciary of pakistan
Rated 0/5 based on 39 review
A History of the Judiciary in Pakistan